The postcolonial framework turns out to be
crucial to understand
the differences that colonialism established between First and Third World
countries.
The colonies were regarded as trading freight
that could be bought and sold and whose only function was to contribute to the
metropolis's economic and territorial expansion.
From a feminist point of view:
-
these
settlements epitomised the female powerlessness as opposed to the patriarchal
domination represented by the empire.
-
These colonial territories, like women, were
subdued to the male/imperial authority, which usually took the form of rape or
physical harassment.
-
This
feminised version of the colony facilitated the attribution of all the
sterotypes that were traditionally associated to women, weakness,
sentimentality and dependence.
-
The
colony was forced to occupy a secondary and marginalised position and to assume
its voicelessness, a stance that native women were forced to acknowledge on a
daily basis.
The colonial environment was traditionally
regarded as exotic, mysterious and unexplored, which justified the conquest of lands in the
name of the empire:
-
This
exoticism drew the attention of the explorers , whose devastation of the
colonial soil was taken as an exercise of patriotism.
-
Once they took over the land, the next stage
was to set up a private space in which only the colonial administrators could
have access to, which helped them to be cut off from any contact with the
native population and to widen the differences between the two groups.
-
This is reflected in Defoe's "Robinson
Crusoe", whose protagonist establishes an economic and working system that
turns out to be a direct transposition of the British counterpart.
-
However,
Cruso's emerges as its parodic reversal, since the exoticism in Defoe's novel
turns into an impoverished and desolate setting in "Foe":
·
Such
a depressing scenario reflects upon Britain's moral emptiness.
·
Cruso's "un-colonial" conscience
deactivates the impulse of expanding his domain and triggers a conformist
attitude in the character.
·
This
explains why silence emerges as a distinctive trait of the island and why
Susan's internal monologues occupy significant sections in "Foe"'s
first two chapters.
·
Cruso's
decision to remain silent most of the time can also be interpreted as another
mechanism to interfere in the expansion of the colonial ideology through
discourse.
With Susan Barton's return to Britain, the
setting moves from the colonies to the metropolis, which she considers a
way back to civilisation:
-
There
is a great deal of postcolonial works that depict the difficult transition
undergone by the immigrant who abandons his hometown in search of better
economic and working opportunities in Europe or in USA, to leave a past of
poverty and marginalisation behind and enjoy the advantages of the West.
-
Once
they arrive at their destination, they realise that their expectations of rapid
social and economic improvement clash with an environment that excludes them
due to racial or gender prejudices.
-
Thus,
their experience in the metropolis turns out to be a succession of
disappointments that end up frustrating the immigrants' initial expectations.
-
In Susan's case, the situation is doubly
ironic because, although she belongs to the mainstream, she approaches her return
as if she were an emigrant. After a depondent year on the island, she looks
forward to arriving in Britain in order to start a successful career as a
novelist and to experiment the privileges that western, First world countries
supposedly confer upon their citizens.
-
However, her arrival in England proves to be
disheartening because:
·
She
has difficulty locating Foe
·
London
is not the glittering and luxurious city she had imagined.
·
The riches she dreams of turn into
homelessness, destitution and loneliness in London.
-
Contrary
to the island, London seems to represent verbosity and communication, although
what Susan encounters is a city in which personal interaction is practically
non-existent.
-
Thus, the narration carries on focusing on
Susan's interior monologues, which again gives an idea of the absence of
dialogue or whatever form of intercommunication.
-
This lack of communication points at
symbolical issues that go beyond the literary realm to find a parallel in how
the bilateral relationships "North-South/East-West" have been
traditionally configured. Here, Susan and Friday represent these two opposite
realities and the South African situation lived under "apartheid", in
which the black population was systematically silenced by the white authorities.
Cap comentari:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada