Her
literary fame rests on The Awakening.
Although
in her own time she was praised for her aesthetic achievement, she was
immediately condemned on moral grounds for writing a story about the artistic
and sexual awakening of a young woman dissatisfied with her conventional role
as wife and mother.
The
sympathetic treatment of a theme that caused such a scandal at the end of the
19th c could not fail to attract the attention of mid-20th-c
feminist critics, whose insights began to reveal the complexity of Chopin’s
art.
Over
several decades feminist criticism has produced the largest body of scholarship
on Chopin’s writings so far available, has aroused a great deal of public
interest in them, and has also encouraged a considerable number of analyses
from other important theoretical perspectives unrelated to feminism.
Chopin
had almost been forgotten after the publication of The Awakening until 1969.
In
the meantime her only texts that had remained in print were a few short stories
often anthologized as illustrative examples of regionalist or local colour
fiction, a genre that became commercially successful when it emerged after the
Civil War, because it satisfied a new curiosity among Americans to learn about
the different regions of their reunited nation.
This
way of keeping her memory barely alive had the negative effect of confining her
to a narrow designation and reducing her status to that of marginalized “local
colourist”, a label that has often been used derogatorily.
Nowadays
her work as a whole tends to be placed within the more prestigious literary
movements of realism and naturalism.
As
for the short narratives that had served to exemplify local colour fiction,
they have recently been reinterpreted as subversive pieces that use the
conventions of the genre in order to undermine and dismantle the conservative
ideology it helped to support.
Her
Louisiana stories accurately depicted the everyday life of ordinary people in
an area that seemed particularly exotic to the rest of America, but she did not
restrict herself to capturing an alien atmosphere and rendering it vividly to
her readers through a skilful handling of picturesque details.
She
adopted many of the typical features of the regionalist writing that was
popular among her contemporaries, and then went beyond the surface
representations of folkways and speech patterns in order to examine the values
of southern society and explore fundamental issues in regard to humanity at
large.
Unlike
most regionalists, she expressed no nostalgia for the past, for she did not
present and idealized picture of the Old South.
Both
bilingual and bicultural, she is now recognized as the first major writer in
American literature who was formed outside the Protestant Anglo-Saxon mainstream.
The Awakening:
-
It was her last and best
novel.
-
It is a complex narrative
about Edna Pontellier’s growth from being her husband’s possession to achieving
her self-ownership.
-
She is a discontented wife
and mother who experiences an awakening or process of self-discovery that makes
her yearn for sexual freedom and artistic fulfilment.
-
Her audaciously sympathetic
treatment of her female protagonist elicited many hostile critical reactions.
-
Many reviewers allowed for
the aesthetic merit of the book and praised its skilful technique, but most of
them disapproved of Chopin’s handling of the theme of adultery and deplored her
choice of an “improper” and “essentially vulgar” subject matter.
-
Not all the reviews were
unanimously unfavourable; some were commendatory and others were mixed.
-
Not all the readers felt
outraged, for there were contemporary women who liked the novel and sent its
author warm letters full of appreciation.
-
Although some people may
have discovered a new aspect of the writer’s personality, the contents of the
novel could hardly have surprised all those who had attended the artistic and
literary salon, notable for its liberal thinking.
-
In any case, the invitations
she received at the time proved that she was not totally ostracized in her
city. And contrary to common belief and according to library records, the book
was never banned or withdrawn from libraries.
-
Also contrary to the idea
that she sank into a severe emotional depression following an overall harsh
reaction against her last novel, her correspondence does not suggest that she
was disheartened by the controversy it caused.
-
The novel clearly denounced
the subordinate role of women and proclaimed their right to independence.
Several
editors asked her to rewrite the stories they considered too indelicate or
immoral for an audience of true ladies.
She
reacted to censure in various ways:
·
Sometimes she altered what
she had submitted for publication, and developed an ability to hide encoded
meanings that can only be uncovered by a close reading of her polished texts.
·
On other occasions, she
resisted pressure and suffered the consequences of dealing with subject matter
that was deemed provocative, especially when treated by a female writer who was
expected to conform the prevailing mores.
·
For example:
-
She never attempted to find
a publisher for her most explicitly erotic story, “The Storm”, the joyful
sexual fantasy of an unpunished happy adultery.
-
“The Story of an Hour”,
about the sense of freedom enjoyed by a woman during the hour she mistakenly
thinks she is a widow until she discovers that her husband is still alive. This
one was refused by the editor of The Century.
·
Undoubtedly one of the
reasons for such rejections was the fact that her heroines were gradually
becoming less submissive and more independent.
·
From the beginning of her
career she had presented female characters forced to endure oppressive
attachments to unattractive men. But she began to get into trouble when she
imagined these discontented women rebelling against their situation, drawn to
men who were not their husbands and openly exposing the oppressive nature of
their marriage contracts.
·
She also wrote about
sexuality in the lives of men and women with a frankness rarely seen in the
work of 19th-c female writers.
Her
apparently clear and direct style of her brilliantly compressed prose has been
thoroughly revised in search of subtle ironies that may be missed by careless
readers.
Her
meticulously chosen symbolism is now considered not merely decorative, but an
essential artistic component of her technique.
She
used symbols to project the psyche of her characters.
Her
concentration on the mind of each individual character has been linked to the
psychological realism of the French writer Guy de Maupassant, whom she greatly
admired.
Other
strong influences upon her writings were exerted by Zola and Flaubert.
She
responded to various intellectual currents of her time and often drew on real
life for her inspiration.
Nevertheless,
she transcended her sources when she created a body of work that spoke in her
own voice.
Her
attitude towards slavery and her portrayal of black people have recently
received a certain amount of scholarly attention:
·
The fact that she had been
brought up in a Missouri slaveowning family that had supported the Confederacy
during the Civil War should not lead to the conclusion that she approved of the
"peculiar institution".
·
Although slavery had been
abolished when she moved to Louisiana, the 14 years she spent there allowed her
to ascertain how the class structure of that southern state was still
absolutely determined by the power relations of the antebellum system.
·
As she set most of her
narratives in the postbellum period, they embodied a vision of society deeply
concerned not with slavery itself but with its legacy.
The
few stories she set before the American Civil War, such as “Désirée’s Baby”,
had tragic endings that subverted the idyllic images offered by the plantation
novels that she evoked in the deliberately deceptive beginnings of her
narratives.
Cap comentari:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada