“Technoculture” is an
ill-chosen word to describe the substrate of postmodernist literature that
illustrates the relationship between mankind, history, society, and technology. This is an erroneous term because it implies
the study of more than just literature, embracing art, music, and film. However, because this is the established term
in the world of literary criticism, it will stand for the time being. (Author’s note: I prefer the term Techno-lit to describe this
form of literature.)
According to
Postmodern American Fiction, one of the first titles in Technoculture is Thomas
Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49 (1966).
Also among early titles is Le Guin’s The Left Hand of Darkness. While most readers consider Le Guin a
science-fiction writer, the truth is Technoculture both embraces and rejects
science-fiction. Even though many titles
and authors fall under both designations, there are a few who are solely
science-fiction such as Jules Verne and Edgar Rice Burroughs, and contemporary
writers like Robert Aspirin and Mercedes Lackey. The difference between a purely
science-fiction text and on that typifies Technoculture is the sense of a theme
that comments on the present while being set in the future. For example, John Carter of Mars is singly
science-fiction because it focuses only on the life of one man who takes a
fantastic journey to the surface of Mars, while Le Guin’s short story “Vaster
Than Empires and More Slow” discusses the prospect of human intellect coming in
second on a galactic scale.
Some of Le Guin’s
works typify the characteristics of Technoculture literature, meaning that they
illustrate how one person or a group of people react with knowledge of their
history, technology, and their own civilization. To illustrate how a person deals with his
perceived history and civilization take a look at The Lathe of Heaven (later
adapted for a television movie) which characterizes how a single person, George
Orr, copes with the knowledge that he and several other people have the ability
to change the world merely by dreaming.
Because the story draws a correlation between this very ability and that
singular talent exhibited by writers, the story “becomes a metafiction, a
reading that influences our response to various aspects of the text”
(Malmgren).
The Four Themes of Technoculture
The Ghost in the Machine
This phrase applies to
the idea that mankind’s divinity/salvation lies in science. Donna Haraway’s article “A Cyborg
Manifesto: Science, Technology, and
Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century” comments on this idea.
The…distinction is between animal-human (organism) and machine. Pre-cybernetic machines could be haunted;
there was always the spectre of the ghost in the machine. (Haraway 606)
What she means is this: man projects himself onto his creations, seeking
a path to his own divinity. Le Guin
addresses this in “Schrödinger’s Cat” by using the story of a quantum physics
experiment developed by Erwin Schrödinger involving a cat being put into a
box. The whole point of the experiment
is that before Zero-Time (five seconds after the box is closed) the whole
“system” is calculated using Newtonian physics, but after that time, a much
more complicated set of equations must be used to determine the outcome of the
experiment. Because the man in the story
is so eager to boil his universe down into equations and experiments, it is the
woman’s job to retain some level of humanity.
She accomplishes this when the cat jumps into the box on its own and the
man refuses to open it. She knows what
is in the box: nothing. While the man wants to know if “God does play
dice with the world” the woman merely wants to understand the changes the world
has undergone, not be bound up in the whys and why nots.
Origins
This one is simple
enough. It illustrates how man
reconciles his mythology, which he has carefully cultivated over the
centuries—including what he always believed was his history—with what is now
known to be scientific fact. This is
pointed out in “She Unnames Them,” a humorous short story involving a domestic
altercation between Adam and Eve, his active disbelief that she will abandon
him, and the importance of woman’s perceived authority. Even though Adam named all the animals, she
“unnamed” them, freeing them to discover their own place in the universe
instead of relying on man’s projection.
The Hypothetical
This theme embodies man’s
dread of the unknown, in spite of his desire to make it a possession. In “Vaster Than Empire and More Slow,” the
main characters are members of a research team sent to explore a seemingly
uninhabited planetoid. It appears to be
covered in rolling grass fields and thick forests, but one member of the
team—who is an empathy, one who picks up the emotions of others—discovers that
the trees are the inhabitants. Not only
are they sentient, they are sapient and ready to purge the human invasion of
their planet. The looming question in
this story becomes whether or not human beings are the only cognizant beings in
the universe, and if they are not, what is?
The Future
This designation, like
Origins, is fairly straightforward. Or
is it? In The Dispossessed (1974), Le
Guin offers up the idea that a utopian society might not be the best course of
action for a people that thrive on conflict and violence. Humankind’s future hangs continually in the
balance, and no one within it can say for certain whether it will continue to
be the dominant force or become enslaved to its technology as it reaches out to
new worlds among the stars.
Conclusion
Ursula K. Le Guin might
be considered a premier science-fiction writer, but her real talents lie in her
ability to perceive human perception and conditions. Her characters always strive to know more, to
understand what contributes to those conditions. It is not her unforgiving imagery or language
that grabs a reader’s attention, it is her unerring ability to see past what
the reader would project onto the literature and force her ideas home. In a sense, Le Guin helped create and shape
the designation “Technoculture.” It is
her work that has contributed time and again, remaining a provocative influence
on other writers both yearling and old-hat.
Because her work captures a reader’s understanding, she transports them
into the midst of her ideas making them a part of a reader’s thought processes.
Cap comentari:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada